公开知识文档

A comprehensive benchmarking with practical guidelines for cellular deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics.

Spatial transcriptomics technologies are used to profile transcriptomes while preserving spatial information, which enables high-resolution characterization of transcriptional patterns and reconstruction of tissue architecture. Due to the existence of low-resolution spots in recent spatial transcriptomics technologies, uncovering cellular heterogeneity is crucial for disentangling the spatial patterns of cell types, and many related methods have been proposed. Here, we benchmark 18 existing methods resolving a cellular deconvolution task with 50 real-world and simulated datasets by evaluating the accuracy, robustness, and usability of the methods. We compare these methods comprehensively using different metrics, resolutions, spatial transcriptomics technologies, spot numbers, and gene numbers. In terms of performance, CARD, Cell2location, and Tangram are the best methods for conducting the cellular deconvolution task. To refine our comparative results, we provide decision-tree-style gu

A comprehensive benchmarking with practical guidelines for cellular deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics.

> 商业许可源文 · EUROPE_PMC · [CC-BY](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/)

书目信息

  • 引用:Li H, Zhou J, Li Z, Chen S, Liao X, Zhang B, Zhang R, Wang Y, Sun S, Gao X. (2023). A comprehensive benchmarking with practical guidelines for cellular deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics. Nature communications. PMID 36941264 · PMC10027878 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-37168-7
  • 证据类型:GUIDELINE
  • 主题:rna-seq、spatial-omics
  • 被引次数(采集时):164
  • 原始记录:[Europe PMC](https://europepmc.org/article/MED/36941264)
  • 来源许可:[CC-BY](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/)
  • 作者摘要(按来源许可复用)

    Spatial transcriptomics technologies are used to profile transcriptomes while preserving spatial information, which enables high-resolution characterization of transcriptional patterns and reconstruction of tissue architecture. Due to the existence of low-resolution spots in recent spatial transcriptomics technologies, uncovering cellular heterogeneity is crucial for disentangling the spatial patterns of cell types, and many related methods have been proposed. Here, we benchmark 18 existing methods resolving a cellular deconvolution task with 50 real-world and simulated datasets by evaluating the accuracy, robustness, and usability of the methods. We compare these methods comprehensively using different metrics, resolutions, spatial transcriptomics technologies, spot numbers, and gene numbers. In terms of performance, CARD, Cell2location, and Tangram are the best methods for conducting the cellular deconvolution task. To refine our comparative results, we provide decision-tree-style guidelines and recommendations for method selection and their additional features, which will help users easily choose the best method for fulfilling their concerns.

    合规说明

    本页保存的是来源文献书目信息及其在 CC-BY 许可下公开的作者摘要。除去除来源 HTML 标签和规范化空白外,摘要未作内容改写。本页不代表 GeniOmics 的医学建议;原文版权、署名和许可仍归原权利人,请通过原始记录核对最新版本、更正或撤稿状态。

    A comprehensive benchmarking with practical guidelines for cellular deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics. · GeniOmics